<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">


<channel>
			<title><![CDATA[文章分類: 通識--個人成長 (燦榮之友)]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[中學通識科必讀]]></description>
	<link>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ArticleListing&amp;postCategoryId=191509</link>

<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:14:41 +0800</lastBuildDate>

<generator>mysinablog-2.0</generator>




<item>
<title><![CDATA[亨利手球]]></title>

	<description><![CDATA[<p name="livewords" class="livewords"><p>【明報專訊】<a onclick="ondemand('亨利','1');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">亨利</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>的「上帝之手」令<a onclick="ondemand('法國','9');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">法國</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>出線世盃決賽周，亦為法國帶來龐大經濟效益。有專家指出，出線世盃能為法國這種規模的國家，帶來約128億港元的經濟效益。<a onclick="ondemand('英國','2');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">英國</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>考文垂大學的運動商業策略教授查德威克（Simon Chadwick）說：「這將在直接受惠的行業中引起漣漪作用，像是體育博彩及雜誌出版……漣漪作用甚至將遠至電器零售及生產，因為人們在大賽時傾向買更多電視。這是心理因素——運動上的成功令人們感到更樂觀及更易買東西」。</p><p><a onclick="ondemand('愛爾蘭','5');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">愛爾蘭</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>經濟損失13億</p><p>相比下，亨利的「上帝之手」則重挫了愛爾蘭經濟。愛爾蘭的衰退本已是歐洲最嚴重，分析師魯姆斯（Owen James）說，今次無緣出線，「若根據家庭開支數字及其他因素，我估計愛爾蘭經濟將損失1億鎊（約12.8億港元）。」巴克萊銀行的波茨（Henk Potts）則說：「零售業和酒吧娛樂事業收入將受挫。在國家隊作賽前，超市一些產品的銷量總會上升，博彩商亦會預期，若愛爾蘭入圍，將有更多（賭博）活動」。</p><p>亨利上帝之手惡搞照片則在網上熱傳。不少愛爾蘭及外國球迷都不滿他出術而紛紛為他改相。Facebook上就成立了群組，要求「將法國踢出明年南非<a onclick="ondemand('世界盃','4');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">世界盃</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>」。</p><p>每日郵報</p></p>]]></description>

<link>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=2037660</link>
<comments>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=2037660</comments>
<guid>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=2037660</guid>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[licw2004]]></dc:creator>

		<category><![CDATA[通識--個人成長]]></category>

<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:14:41 +0800</pubDate>

	<source url="http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/rss.php&amp;categoryId=191509"><![CDATA[通識--個人成長 (燦榮之友)]]></source>

</item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[偏見的代價]]></title>

	<description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: 新細明體">當我們選擇職業、拍檔或上司，究竟有沒有任何偏見呢</span><span><font face="Times New Roman">?</font></span></font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: 新細明體"><font size="3">請細心聆聽以下的問題</font></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: -18pt; margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt 18pt; tab-stops: list 18.0pt"><span><span><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">一.</font><span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">  </span></font></span></span><span><font size="3"><span style="font-family: 新細明體">選擇拍擋，請問寧願是肥還是瘦呢</span><span><font face="Times New Roman">?</font></span></font></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: -18pt; margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt 18pt; tab-stops: list 18.0pt"><span><span><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">二.</font><span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">  </span></font></span></span><font size="3"><span><span style="font-family: 新細明體">同樣是選擇拍擋，請問寧願是</span><span><font face="Times New Roman">IQ</font></span></span><span style="font-family: 新細明體">高一點還是低一點呢</span></font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: -18pt; margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt 18pt; tab-stops: list 18.0pt"><span><span><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="3">三.</font><span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">  </span></font></span></span><span><font size="3"><span style="font-family: 新細明體">假如上司是可以由你決定的，你寧願是男還是女呢</span><span><font face="Times New Roman">?</font></span></font></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: 新細明體">相信大家都會有些微傾向，但問題是，這個傾向，我們究竟願意用多大的金錢代價來換取呢</span><span><font face="Times New Roman">?</font></span></font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: 新細明體">有研究發現，為著選擇較瘦的拍擋，原來我們願意拍擋的</span><span><font face="Times New Roman">IQ</font></span><span style="font-family: 新細明體">降十二點</span></font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: 新細明體"><font size="3">另方面，為著要選擇一個男上司，原來有人願意減百份之廿二的薪金。</font></span></p><span><o><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></o></span> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: 新細明體">不可思議，不能相信，是不是呢</span><span><font face="Times New Roman">?</font></span></font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><font size="3"><span style="font-family: 新細明體">但這是芝加哥大學<st1 productid="尤金">尤金</st1>教授最近的研究成果，而且在權威的科學雜誌</span><span><font face="Times New Roman">SCIENTIC AMERICAN MIND</font></span><span style="font-family: 新細明體">刊登。</span></font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><font size="3"><st1 productid="尤金"><span style="font-family: 新細明體">尤金</span></st1><span style="font-family: 新細明體">教授指出，大部份人都會詑異有這樣的結果，原因是我們受潛意識影響亦不自覺。</span></font></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-family: 新細明體"><font size="3">但何以人們會較喜歡瘦的拍擋和男上司，看來還有待研究。</font></span></p><span><o><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></o></span>]]></description>

<link>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=2014692</link>
<comments>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=2014692</comments>
<guid>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=2014692</guid>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[licw2004]]></dc:creator>

		<category><![CDATA[通識--個人成長]]></category>

<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:33:38 +0800</pubDate>

	<source url="http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/rss.php&amp;categoryId=191509"><![CDATA[通識--個人成長 (燦榮之友)]]></source>

</item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[情人眼裡出西施]]></title>

	<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-family: 新細明體; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt">中國人說情人眼裡出西施，不用太多解說，大家都覺得理所當然。</span><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt"><o></o></span><span style="font-family: 新細明體; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt">今時今日，西方人用科學的方式來印正了，佛羅里達大學心理學教授祖恩文拿</span><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt">Jon <st1>Ma</st1>ner</span><span style="font-family: 新細明體; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt">做了有力的實驗。</span><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt"><o></o></span><span style="font-family: 新細明體; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt">第一個實驗，參加者首先觀看不同人的面孔，每個的時間都是半秒，然後再看一組圓形或正方形圖案，並以最快時間決定所看的是甚麼圖形。</span><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt"><o></o></span><span style="font-family: 新細明體; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt">結果發現，參加者看過美麗的異性面孔之後，要轉移注意力到圓形或正方形，時間會較長。</span><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt"><o></o></span><span style="font-family: 新細明體; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt">實驗二，要求一夫一妻，或已經同居的人參加做研究，參加者分成兩半，一半先講出愛的感受，一半先講出開心的感受，然後再重覆第一個實驗，結果發現，談到愛的感覺才參與實驗的人，比常人更快抽離美麗的異性面孔，快捷地說出圓形還是正方形。</span><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt"><o></o></span><span style="font-family: 新細明體; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt">但談到快樂感受的另一半參加者，則則常人沒有分別，容易受到美麗的異性面孔吸引。</span><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt"><o></o></span><span style="font-family: 新細明體; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt">心理學家認為，只要我們心中的是愛，就容易對其他美貎視而不見。</span><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt"><o></o></span><span style="font-family: 新細明體; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt">不信的話，一是參照在</span><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt">Scientific American mind</span><span style="font-family: 新細明體; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt">的原文，一是與愛人携手，看看他會否仍然對街上的其他美人目不轉睛</span><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt"><o></o></span><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt"><o> </o></span><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #333333; font-size: 15.5pt"><o> </o></span><span><o><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"> </font></o></span>]]></description>

<link>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=2014682</link>
<comments>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=2014682</comments>
<guid>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=2014682</guid>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[licw2004]]></dc:creator>

		<category><![CDATA[通識--個人成長]]></category>

<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:28:05 +0800</pubDate>

	<source url="http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/rss.php&amp;categoryId=191509"><![CDATA[通識--個人成長 (燦榮之友)]]></source>

</item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[boxing]]></title>

	<description><![CDATA[<p style="display: inline"><font size="3">【明報專訊】拳壇上父親做兒子的教練例子不少，不過最近有報告研究顯示，大多數拳手在場上被打死時，身兼兩職的父親都在場邊。世界拳擊理事會就呼籲，禁止兼任教練的父親出現在場邊，以免再發</font></p><table align="right" border="0"><tbody><tr><td><p align="center" style="margin-bottom: 10px"><iframe frameborder="0" height="250" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" src="http://ad.yieldmanager.com/st?ad_type=iframe&amp;ad_size=300x250&amp;site=146157&amp;section_code=13727287&amp;cb=1257385272591517&amp;ycg=m&amp;yyob=&amp;pub_redirect_unencoded=1&amp;pub_redirect=http://hk.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=15q9onsto/M=624183.13727287.13760562.4884488/D=hk_sports/S=96409650:LREC/Y=HKC/EXP=1257392472/L=wkmjJHxsaX3KvRRlR67KIgiC2meVi0ryLTgACNm8/B=nkxTNnxsXlk-/J=1257385272591517/K=rGpJRkoTQu122QX5Q9LzSw/A=4983839/R=0/*" width="300"></iframe><font size="3"></font></p><script language="javascript">




if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object();
window.yzq_d['nkxTNnxsXlk-']='&amp;U=13fvi3f5u%2fN%3dnkxTNnxsXlk-%2fC%3d624183.13727287.13760562.4884488%2fD%3dLREC%2fB%3d4983839%2fV%3d1';</script><noscript></noscript></td></tr></tbody></table><p style="display: inline"><font size="3">生致命意外。</font></p><p>拳會擬禁父現身場邊</p><p>最近加州一項研究顯示，教練兼父親在場邊觀看兒子的比賽，令拳手在場上被打死的機會率增加，世界拳擊理事會總裁獲加說：「兩者之間顯然擁有一定關係。太多父親投射自己的希望在兒子身上，希望他們一直戰鬥下去，但他們不是被捱打的一人。」世界沉量級拳王比圖以其個人經驗分析道：「在拳擊場上，父親有時會將教練及父親的角色混淆，因此未能作出適當的判斷。」</p><p>現時世界拳擊理事會正商討有關禁止父親在場邊觀戰的事宜，以防止父親不讓兒棄權而發生打死人慘劇</p>]]></description>

<link>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=2010933</link>
<comments>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=2010933</comments>
<guid>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=2010933</guid>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[licw2004]]></dc:creator>

		<category><![CDATA[通識--個人成長]]></category>

<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:42:52 +0800</pubDate>

	<source url="http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/rss.php&amp;categoryId=191509"><![CDATA[通識--個人成長 (燦榮之友)]]></source>

</item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[botox and happy]]></title>

	<description><![CDATA[<p>This February psychologists at the University of Cardiff in Wales found that people whose ability to frown is compromised by cosmetic botox injections are happier, on average, than people who can frown. The researchers administered an anxiety and depression questionnaire to 25 females, half of whom had received frown-inhibiting botox injections. The botox recipients reported feeling happier and less anxious in general; more important, they did not report feeling any more attractive, which suggests that the emotional effects were not driven by a psychological boost that could come from the treatment's cosmetic nature.</p><p>The concept works the opposite way, too — enhancing emotions rather than suppressing them. People who frown during an unpleasant procedure report feeling more pain than those who do not, according to a study published in May 2008 in the Journal of Pain. Researchers applied heat to the forearms of 29 participants, who were asked to either make unhappy, neutral or relaxed faces during the procedure. Those who exhibited negative expressions reported being in more pain than the other two groups. Lewis, who was not involved in that study, says he plans to study the effect that botox injections have on pain perception. "It's possible that people may feel less pain if they're unable to express it," he says.</p>]]></description>

<link>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1947944</link>
<comments>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1947944</comments>
<guid>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1947944</guid>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[licw2004]]></dc:creator>

		<category><![CDATA[通識--個人成長]]></category>

<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:55:32 +0800</pubDate>

	<source url="http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/rss.php&amp;categoryId=191509"><![CDATA[通識--個人成長 (燦榮之友)]]></source>

</item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[Forget Survival of the Fittest: It Is Kindness That Counts ---Scientific American Mind]]></title>

	<description><![CDATA[This kind of science gives me many hopes for the future. At the broadest level, I hope that our culture shifts from a consumption-based, materialist culture to one that privileges the social joys (play, caring, touch, mirth) that are our older (in the evolutionary sense) sources of the good life. In more specific terms, I see this new science informing practices in almost every realm of life. Here again are some well-founded examples: Medical doctors are now receiving training in the tools of compassion — empathetic listening, warm touch — that almost certainly improve basic health outcomes. Teachers now regularly teach the tools of empathy and respect. In prisons and juvenile detention centers, meditation is being taught. And executives are learning the wisdom of emotional intelligence — respect, building trust — and that there is more to a company's thriving than profit or the bottom line.]]></description>

<link>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1947942</link>
<comments>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1947942</comments>
<guid>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1947942</guid>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[licw2004]]></dc:creator>

		<category><![CDATA[通識--個人成長]]></category>

<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:50:26 +0800</pubDate>

	<source url="http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/rss.php&amp;categoryId=191509"><![CDATA[通識--個人成長 (燦榮之友)]]></source>

</item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[confindence wins over smarts]]></title>

	<description><![CDATA[Confidence Wins over Smarts <br />Speaking up counts more than competence in becoming a leader <br />When a group of people works to complete a task, a leader usually emerges. New research shows such leaders are not necessarily more intelligent than the other group members, but rather they simply speak up more often. Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, gave groups of college students 45 minutes to lay the groundwork for a business and then asked the students to rate one another on intelligence, judgment and other traits. The students believed that the people who spoke more often were the smartest in each group — even when, during another group exercise involving math problems, they offered more incorrect answers than did others who were less talkative. Those who did not say much were judged as averagely intelligent and not so creative. A later look at the participants' SAT scores revealed that, on average, the leaders had the same scores as the rest of the group. "The main reason dominant people took charge is they jumped in first and nobody questioned what they said," says psychologist Cameron Anderson, who led the study. "Dominant people seem really good at things because they speak with so much confidence."]]></description>

<link>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1941060</link>
<comments>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1941060</comments>
<guid>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1941060</guid>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[licw2004]]></dc:creator>

		<category><![CDATA[通識--個人成長]]></category>

<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:01:21 +0800</pubDate>

	<source url="http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/rss.php&amp;categoryId=191509"><![CDATA[通識--個人成長 (燦榮之友)]]></source>

</item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[易中天談中國文化]]></title>

	<description><![CDATA[儒家关注文化，留下的是仁爱、正义、自强。 <p>墨家关注社会，留下的是平等、互利、博爱。</p><p>道家关注人生，留下的是真实、自由、宽容。</p><p>法家关注国家，留下的是公开、公平、公正。</p>]]></description>

<link>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1819082</link>
<comments>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1819082</comments>
<guid>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1819082</guid>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[licw2004]]></dc:creator>

		<category><![CDATA[通識--個人成長]]></category>

<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:41:24 +0800</pubDate>

	<source url="http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/rss.php&amp;categoryId=191509"><![CDATA[通識--個人成長 (燦榮之友)]]></source>

</item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[易中天讀先秦諸子心得]]></title>

	<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-indent: 21pt"><span style="font-family: 宋体">现在，可以总结一下我读先秦诸子的心得体会了。我的体会是：</span></p><span class="MASS0bd94ceb6152"></span><p style="text-indent: 21pt"><span style="font-family: 宋体">读孔子见“恻隐之心”，得“仁爱精神”；</span></p><p style="text-indent: 21pt"><span class="MASS0bd94ceb6152"></span><span style="font-family: 宋体">读孟子见“浩然之气”，得“义勇精神”；</span></p><p style="text-indent: 21pt"><span style="font-family: 宋体">读老子见“玄妙之智”，得“辩证精神”；</span></p><span class="MASS0bd94ceb6152"></span><p style="text-indent: 21pt"><span style="font-family: 宋体">读庄子见“通透之慧”，得“超脱精神”；<span style="font-family: 宋体"> </span></span></p><span style="font-family: 宋体"><span style="font-family: 宋体">读墨子见“身体力行”，得“实践精神”；</span></span><span style="font-family: 宋体"> <p style="text-indent: 21pt"><span style="font-family: 宋体">读韩非见“直面人生”，得“现实精神”；</span></p><span class="MASS0bd94ceb6152"></span><p style="text-indent: 21pt"><span style="font-family: 宋体">读荀子见“事在人为”，得“自强精神”；</span></p></span>]]></description>

<link>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1818935</link>
<comments>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1818935</comments>
<guid>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1818935</guid>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[licw2004]]></dc:creator>

		<category><![CDATA[通識--個人成長]]></category>

<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:03:08 +0800</pubDate>

	<source url="http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/rss.php&amp;categoryId=191509"><![CDATA[通識--個人成長 (燦榮之友)]]></source>

</item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[快樂指數]]></title>

	<description><![CDATA[<p name="livewords" class="livewords"><p>(綜合報道)</p><p>(<a onclick="ondemand('星島日報','11');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">星島日報</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>報道)世上如果真的有人間天堂，可能就在拉丁美洲！<a onclick="ondemand('英國','5');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">英國</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>有組織計算了各國公民的預期壽命，對生活的滿意度和氣候環境變化等因素，發現世上十大最幸福的國家地區中，有八個來自拉丁美洲，其中哥斯達黎加居榜首，居民的生活滿意度達八點五分（十分為滿分）；而中國則排第廿位，香港排第八十四位；但經濟發達的八大工業國則排在中下游位置，其中以<a onclick="ondemand('美國','17');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">美國</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>表現最差，排第一百一十四位。</p><p>　　英國非政府組織「新經濟基金」調查了一百四十三個國家和地區，計算當地公民的預期壽命，對生活的滿意度和氣候環境變化等因素，公布了「幸福星球指數」排名，發現哥斯達黎加居榜首，當地公民的預期壽命達七十八點五歲，以十分為滿分的生活滿意度更達八點五分，而十大最幸福的國家地區中，除排第五位的<a onclick="ondemand('越南','26');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">越南</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>和排第六的哥倫比亞外，其餘八個位於拉丁美洲，而通漲嚴重失控的<a onclick="ondemand('非洲','9');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">非洲</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>津巴布韋則排榜尾。</p><p>　　至於中國和香港的排名分別是第二十和第八十四位，其中港人的預期壽命達八十一點九歲，是全球第二長，僅次於<a onclick="ondemand('日本','4');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">日本</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>的八十二點三歲，而港人的生活滿意度則有七點二分，屬上游水平；中國的公民預期壽命則為七十二點五歲，民眾對生活滿意度為六點二分。另外，<a onclick="ondemand('印度','15');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">印度</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>排名第三十五位。</p><p>　　調查又指，經濟發達的地區未必是最幸福的地區，例如八大工業國的排名則在中下游位置，當中以<a onclick="ondemand('德國','6');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">德國</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>居首，排第五十一位，其餘依次為<a onclick="ondemand('意大利','14');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">意大利</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>（第六十九位）、<a onclick="ondemand('法國','21');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">法國</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>（第七十一位）、英國（第七十四位）、日本（第七十五位）、<a onclick="ondemand('加拿大','16');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">加拿大</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>（第八十九位）、<a onclick="ondemand('俄羅斯','0');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">俄羅斯</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>（第一百零八位）、美國（第一百一十四位）。調查更指，美國人比十年前更不環保和不快樂。</p><p>　　新經濟基金發言人尼克．馬拉斯表示，雖然拉丁美洲與亞洲不少國家只有中等收入，但國民對生活感滿足，又不像發達國家般浪費太多地球資源，例如榜首的哥斯達黎加，其百分之九十九的能源均是可再生能源，故較發達國家幸福。</p><p>　　他又指，幸福星球指數有助推動發達國家轉變觀念，思考怎樣才能真正改善人民生活水平，以及不可持續的經濟發展模式所帶來氣候變化的後果。</p></p>]]></description>

<link>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1808873</link>
<comments>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1808873</comments>
<guid>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1808873</guid>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[licw2004]]></dc:creator>

		<category><![CDATA[通識--個人成長]]></category>

<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:11:23 +0800</pubDate>

	<source url="http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/rss.php&amp;categoryId=191509"><![CDATA[通識--個人成長 (燦榮之友)]]></source>

</item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[NBA 與英超]]></title>

	<description><![CDATA[<p name="livewords" class="livewords"><p>【明報專訊】英超足球聯賽風靡全球，連<a onclick="ondemand('NBA','10');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">NBA</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>也要參考他們的市場策略。據《金融時報》報道，NBA派出代表赴<a onclick="ondemand('倫敦','7');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">倫敦</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>，與英超代表商討合作事宜。</p><p>努力吸引外資</p><p>英超在出售轉播權時的分區銷售策略，向來視為傑出的營銷範例。雙方在會面中拿出有關轉播權的文件互相比較，NBA對於英超在亞洲地區的「撲水法」尤其感興趣，有意搬字過紙式效法。</p><p>NBA總裁史端不以抄襲為忤：「我們是沒有悔意的模仿者。英超在轉播權談判的能力及他們分拆轉播權套餐的方法，是我們可以學習的。」NBA向來直接與每家電視台談判，而非如英超般以類似代理形式按地區出售。</p><p>近年英超湧現外籍班主，雖然中國投資者近日成為NBA球隊騎士的股東，但史端坦言，英超在吸引外資方面棋高一着，NBA亦自愧不如： 「英超在這方面領先我們，有來自<a onclick="ondemand('俄羅斯','2');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">俄羅斯</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>、<a onclick="ondemand('美國','11');"><span style="display: inline"><span class="vl_kw vl_vlkw">美國</span><span class="vl_icon">    </span></span></a>及中東的投資者。」</p></p>]]></description>

<link>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1771062</link>
<comments>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1771062</comments>
<guid>http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1771062</guid>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[licw2004]]></dc:creator>

		<category><![CDATA[通識--個人成長]]></category>

<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:47:33 +0800</pubDate>

	<source url="http://licw2004.mysinablog.com/rss.php&amp;categoryId=191509"><![CDATA[通識--個人成長 (燦榮之友)]]></source>

</item>

</channel>
</rss>